Do We Want the Book of Acts Church—or the Early American Church?
- Eric Mayfield
- 6 days ago
- 3 min read
This is a question the modern Church must wrestle with honestly.
Do we want the Book of Acts Church, marked by the power and presence of the Holy Spirit?
Or do we want an early American–style church, marked by moral teaching, political awareness, and cultural influence?
Both mattered in history. But they are not the same thing—and confusing them has cost us something vital.
The Book of Acts Church: Power Before Platform
The Book of Acts Church was not born in a strategy meeting.
It was born in an upper room.
They were not trained in rhetoric or political systems.
They were filled with the Holy Spirit.
“But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you shall be My witnesses…” (Acts 1:8)
This church:
Cast out demons
Healed the sick
Raised the dead
Spoke with divine authority
Turned entire cities upside down
They didn’t ask for permission from culture.
They didn’t wait for political alignment.
They carried God.
Their influence didn’t come from being informed—it came from being transformed.
The Early American Church: Information and Formation
The early American church played a different role.
It helped:
Shape moral conscience
Teach biblical literacy
Inform citizens about political and cultural events
Influence laws and governance
This church emphasized:
Sermons rooted in civic responsibility
Awareness of national issues
Scripture applied to public life
This wasn’t evil. In fact, it helped birth a nation with biblical foundations.
But it was not the same fire as Acts.
It leaned more toward instruction than demonstration.
When Information Replaces Power
Here is the danger we face today:
We’ve inherited the American church model
but lost the Acts church mandate.
We are:
Highly informed
Politically aware
Theologically articulate
Yet often:
Prayer lacks fire
Deliverance is rare
Healing is theoretical
Revival is discussed more than encountered
We know what’s happening in government—but not always what’s happening in the spirit.
The Acts Church didn’t comment on the darkness.
They confronted it with light.
Do We Trust Jesus—or Ourselves?
This is where the tension truly lies.
Do we actually trust that Jesus can change people?
Or do we believe that unless we act in our own understanding—strategize harder, argue louder, control outcomes—nothing will change?
Do we trust that Jesus is already at work in the background of people’s lives, convicting hearts, drawing them, and revealing truth long before we ever speak?
Or do we operate as if transformation depends entirely on our ability to persuade?
The Book of Acts Church trusted Jesus enough to wait.
They believed obedience mattered more than urgency.
They believed presence mattered more than pressure.
Jesus Didn’t Promise Influence—He Promised Power
Jesus never told the disciples they would change the world by staying informed.
He told them to wait.
Wait for power.
Wait for fire.
Wait for the Spirit.
Political engagement has its place—but it was never meant to replace spiritual authority.
When the Church loses power, it compensates with opinions.
When it loses presence, it leans on platforms.
One Direction, One Destination
Here is a truth we often forget:
If we are all truly looking at Jesus—
and if we are all truly walking toward Him—
then we will all end up at the same place.
His feet.
Not at the feet of ideology.
Not at the feet of political systems.
Not at the feet of personal understanding.
But at Jesus’ feet—where pride dies, divisions fade, and hearts are transformed.
Unity does not come from uniform opinions.
Unity comes from a shared gaze.
The Question We Must Answer
So the real question is not:
“Should Christians be involved in culture or politics?”
The real question is:
What are we depending on?
Are we trusting:
Knowledge without anointing?
Truth without power?
Information without transformation?
Or do we want to return to a Church that:
Knows how to tarry
Knows how to pray
Knows how to host God
Knows how to move heaven and shake earth
A Call Back to the Upper Room
God is not calling us backward in time.
He’s calling us deeper in surrender.
We don’t need less truth—we need more fire.
We don’t need less engagement—we need more encounter.
The world doesn’t need a Church that can explain what’s wrong.
It needs a Church that can heal, deliver, and demonstrate that Jesus is alive.
So I ask again:
Do we want the Book of Acts Church?
Or are we content with a church that is informed—but powerless?
Because history shows us this:
Information may shape a nation.
But power transforms the world.



Comments